In a March letter requesting the ruling from Homeland Security, the company called it “a recurring issue.” Ingersoll-Rand also warned shareholders in securities filings that it might be affected by the prohibition, and sometimes told customers that it couldn’t accept federal funds during the years to which the ban applied. According to Zelent, the spokeswoman, company executives weren’t initially sure if the contract ban applied to them, so for several years they avoided bidding on any work that was subject to it. It’s unclear, though, which exception Ingersoll-Rand might qualify for. In August, while calling on Congress to tighten tax laws, Obama pledged to take what unilateral action he could to “at least discourage some of the folks who may be trying to take advantage of this loophole.” The next month, his Treasury Department imposed new tax rules to make the deals less attractive. In all, 46 companies have inverted since 1982, including 15 in the past three years. and Medtronic Inc., prompted concern in Washington about erosion of the U.S. Maher wrote to Ingersoll-Rand just before a series of high- profile inversion proposals, including ones from Pfizer Inc. The company’s heating and cooling equipment is used in many government offices and military bases. For several years, Ingersoll-Rand had avoided contracts subject to the ban, according to Zelent, although it continued to do some work for federal agencies based on old, grandfathered contracts. He has served on several boards of non-profit charitable organizations, regularly volunteers at an annual charity event to benefit seniors in his community, and plays ice hockey.Maher’s letter responded to a request for clarification from Ingersoll-Rand about whether or not it could bid for department projects. He is a Special Ethics Master appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New Jersey to serve as a Hearing Officer for complex ethics matters, a past Chair of The District X Ethics Committee of New Jersey and regularly represents New Jersey attorneys in ethics matters. He is the editor of the Defense Counsel Journal, an IADC publication providing a forum for the publication of topical and scholarly writings on the law. Ken recently served a three-year term as a Board Member of the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC). Ingersoll-Rand, the case in which the New Jersey Appellate Courts adopted the alternate safer design theory of The Restatement of Law Third, Torts: Product Liability. Ken obtained a defense verdict and successfully handled the appeal in Congiusti v. He has extensive appellate experience, primarily in product liability cases in New York and New Jersey. He frequently collaborates with teams of outside engineers and experts to provide support for product launches and product risk avoidance and has counseled on product recalls. Ken also provides product liability prevention counseling to product manufactures including start-ups and companies looking to market a product in the U.S. He regularly provides clients with risk assessments, product safety analyses and drafts product warning labels and language for instructional manuals. In addition to his litigation practice, Ken has a deep understanding of product development and the regulatory agencies that supervise U.S. He has litigated cases in state and federal courts in 27 states, has acted as defense liaison counsel for branded pharmaceutical companies, and serves as national coordinating, regional and local counsel. Ken is a senior trial lawyer and commercial litigator who defends complex product liability, mass tort, and significant personal injury and property damage cases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |